[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15718246#comment-15718246
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on FREEMARKER-40:
-------------------------------------------
And, btw, a more helpful error message would, IMO, fix this issue, because the
user can easily fix the bean class, if he , or she knows the reason.
Jochen
> ClassIntrospector should detect public methods in non-public classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FREEMARKER-40
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-40
> Project: Apache Freemarker
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: engine
> Affects Versions: 2.3.25-incubating
> Reporter: Jochen Wiedmann
> Assignee: Daniel Dekany
> Priority: Minor
>
> In ClassIntrospector.discoverAccessibleMethods, the assumption is made, that
> only public classes can have accessible methods. This is plainly wrong: For
> example, a private object might be implementing an interface.
> Freemarker should detect public gettters, and treat them as accessible. At
> the very least, it should inform the user about the problem. A message like
> "Key <propertyName> was not found on an instance of ..."
> should be replaced by
> "Key <propertyName> was not found on an instance of ..."
> "A possible reason is,that the class must be public."
> Thanks,
> Jochen
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
