sabbey37 commented on a change in pull request #6489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/6489#discussion_r636170733



##########
File path: 
geode-apis-compatible-with-redis/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/redis/internal/data/RedisSortedSet.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more 
contributor license
+ * agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional 
information regarding
+ * copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache 
License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the 
License. You may obtain a
+ * copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software 
distributed under the License
+ * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY 
KIND, either express
+ * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions 
and limitations under
+ * the License.
+ *
+ */
+
+package org.apache.geode.redis.internal.data;
+
+import static 
org.apache.geode.redis.internal.data.RedisDataType.REDIS_SORTED_SET;
+
+import java.io.DataInput;
+import java.io.DataOutput;
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.Iterator;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Objects;
+
+import it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.bytes.ByteArrays;
+import it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.objects.Object2ObjectOpenCustomHashMap;
+
+import org.apache.geode.cache.Region;
+import org.apache.geode.internal.InternalDataSerializer;
+import org.apache.geode.internal.serialization.DeserializationContext;
+import org.apache.geode.internal.serialization.KnownVersion;
+import org.apache.geode.internal.serialization.SerializationContext;
+import org.apache.geode.redis.internal.delta.AddsDeltaInfo;
+import org.apache.geode.redis.internal.delta.DeltaInfo;
+import org.apache.geode.redis.internal.delta.RemsDeltaInfo;
+import org.apache.geode.redis.internal.executor.sortedset.SortedSetOptions;
+
+public class RedisSortedSet extends AbstractRedisData {
+  private Object2ObjectOpenCustomHashMap<byte[], byte[]> members;
+
+  protected static final int BASE_REDIS_SORTED_SET_OVERHEAD = 184;
+  protected static final int PER_PAIR_OVERHEAD = 48;
+
+  private int sizeInBytes;
+
+  @Override
+  public int getSizeInBytes() {
+    return sizeInBytes;
+  }
+
+  private enum AddOrChange {
+    ADDED, CHANGED, NOOP
+  }
+
+  private int calculateSizeOfNewFieldValuePair(byte[] member, byte[] score) {
+    return PER_PAIR_OVERHEAD + member.length + score.length;
+  }
+
+  RedisSortedSet(List<byte[]> members) {
+    sizeInBytes += BASE_REDIS_SORTED_SET_OVERHEAD;
+    this.members = new Object2ObjectOpenCustomHashMap<>(members.size(), 
ByteArrays.HASH_STRATEGY);
+    Iterator<byte[]> iterator = members.iterator();
+
+    while (iterator.hasNext()) {
+      byte[] score = iterator.next();
+      byte[] member = iterator.next();
+      sizeInBytes += calculateSizeOfNewFieldValuePair(member, score);
+      this.members.put(member, score);
+    }
+  }
+
+  RedisSortedSet(List<byte[]> members, SortedSetOptions options) {
+    if (options.isXX()) {
+      sizeInBytes += BASE_REDIS_SORTED_SET_OVERHEAD;
+      this.members = new Object2ObjectOpenCustomHashMap<>(members.size(), 
ByteArrays.HASH_STRATEGY);
+    } else {
+      RedisSortedSet tempSet = new RedisSortedSet(members);
+      this.members = tempSet.members;
+      this.sizeInBytes = tempSet.sizeInBytes;
+    }
+  }

Review comment:
       That's correct, the used memory should stay the same if given the XX 
option for a new sorted set.  The key itself should never be created and it 
should not be added to the region at all.  In `NullRedisSortedSet` you've 
already added code to check if the option is XX, which I think is good:
   ```
       if (options.isXX()) {
         return 0;
       }
       region.create(key, new RedisSortedSet(membersToAdd));
   ```
   
   With that code in place, we don't actually need to pass the options to the 
`RedisSortedSet` constructor... and we can get rid of that constructor 
altogether.
   
   Try creating a new sorted set with the XX option in native Redis, then check 
if it exists... it should not exist at all.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to