jamesfredley commented on PR #15684:
URL: https://github.com/apache/grails-core/pull/15684#issuecomment-4564878907

   I agree with standardizing on parentheses for method calls.  It is the 
majority, but separate from this we will need to create a issue to go back to 
cleanup.  
   
   on `origin/8.0.x` (the PR's actual base = historical truth)
   
   Combined `eq` + `like`:
   
   | Scope | paren | no-paren | split |
   |-------|------:|------:|:-----:|
   | All `.groovy` | **109** (92 + 17) | 97 (77 + 20) | ~53 / 47 |
   | `*Spec.groovy` only | **94** (79 + 15) | 78 (69 + 9) | ~55 / 45 |
   
   Per-method breakdown:
   
   | Method / scope | paren | no-paren |
   |---|------:|------:|
   | `eq` - all groovy | **92** | 77 |
   | `eq` - specs only | **79** | 69 |
   | `like` - all groovy | 17 | **20** |
   | `like` - specs only | **15** | 9 |
   
   ## Staging vs base (specs only)
   
   | Branch | paren | no-paren |
   |---|------:|------:|
   | `8.0.x` (base, historical truth) | **94** | 78 |
   | `8.0.x-stage-hibernate7` (staging) | 95 | 88 |
   
   The staging branch added ~10 no-paren spec lines on top of base. The 
migration toward no-paren is something the hibernate7 staging work itself 
introduced, not a pre-existing house style.
   
   
   ## Verdict
   - Historically on `8.0.x`, the **parenthesized form is the plurality** - 
roughly 55/45 in specs, 53/47 overall.
   - `eq(...)` specifically leads in every slice (92 vs 77 overall, 79 vs 69 in 
specs).
   - The only place no-paren wins is `like` across all groovy (20 vs 17), and 
that flips back to paren when restricted to specs (15 vs 9).
   - The `HibernateCriteriaBuilder` javadoc examples and most 
example/integration-test apps use the parenthesized form.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to