[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15177720#comment-15177720 ]
Jochen Theodorou edited comment on GROOVY-7772 at 3/3/16 11:57 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- I would actually like to keep the outside face the same, meaning we create a {xarg, args... ->}.curry( x ) every time. Instead I would like to change the logic inside... but using your logic: {code:Java} {xarg, args... -> if x instanceof Class && y is_not_static_method then args[0].y(args[1..n]) else xarg.y(args) }{code} was (Author: blackdrag): I would actually like to keep the outside face the same, meaning we create a {xarg, args... ->}.curry(x) every time. Instead I would like to change the logic inside... but using your logic: {code:Java} {xarg, args... -> if x instanceof Class && y is_not_static_method then args[0].y(args[1..n]) else xarg.y(args) }{code} > Class.&instanceMethod had better to have same meaning of > Class::instanceMethod of Java8 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GROOVY-7772 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7772 > Project: Groovy > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: groovy-runtime > Affects Versions: 2.4.6 > Reporter: UEHARA Junji > Assignee: Jochen Theodorou > Priority: Minor > > Groovy's operator .& for method is similar functionality to Java8's method > reference operator ::. > ||No.||lhs||rhs||meaing of Groovy's .& (Closure) ||meaning of java8's :: > (FunctionalInterface)|| > |1|instance|instanceMethod| { ..args -> instance.instanceMethod(args) | same > as groovy | > |2|Class|staticMethod| { ..args -> Class.staticMethod(args) | same as groovy | > |3|instance|staticMethod| ERROR groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: | Error > same as groovy (compile error) | > |4|Class|instanceMethod|error| Function<RetType,Class,Args..>, where method > instance method of Class which is declared as ```RetType > instanceMethod(Args..) {...}```. In other words it is interpreted as a > function which takes LHS Class as the first parameter which additionally > inserted to the method.)| > IMHO, i'd like to propose to change the No 4 pattern semantics of groovy > same as Java 8 's. Because: > * You can write: > {code} > ["a,b,c"].collect ( String.&toUpperCase ) > {code} > instaed of > {code} > ["a,b,c"].collect { it.toUpperCase() } > {code} > * Can have correspond operator to java8's ::. which is understandablea and > needed for Java programmers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)