[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15182244#comment-15182244
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-7640:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user PascalSchumacher opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/284

    GROOVY-7640:AST Builder should include superclass properties

    The code is really ugly, but this is caused by a method with is in 
`BuilderASTTransformation` but should have been in `ExternalStrategy`. No it 
can not be moved/modified without breaking binary compatibility.
    
    The pull request is still missing documentation. I will add that if it is 
accepted.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/PascalSchumacher/incubator-groovy 
7640_superclass_prop

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/284.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #284
    
----
commit 18710b9b155646b9de00d821b12db933311503b7
Author: Marc Bogaerts <marcbogae...@telenet.be>
Date:   2015-10-20T15:14:43Z

    GROOVY-7640:AST Builder should include superclass properties

commit fee48bd65d8bf72b440dd66ee5c9735526f060ea
Author: PascalSchumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
Date:   2016-03-06T17:30:12Z

    GROOVY-7640:AST Builder should include superclass properties (closes #152)
    
    make it configurable and make it clear that SimpleStrategy does not support 
this

----


> AST Builder should include superclass properties
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-7640
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7640
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ast builder
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.5
>            Reporter: Marc Bogaerts
>            Priority: Minor
>
> If one annotates a groovy class with @Builder and that class extends from 
> another class, then the generated builder does not support setting the parent 
> class properties.
> This is especially problematic when mixin groovy builders in java code.
> e.g. the following class shows what will and will not compile
> {code:java}
> // Animal.groovy
> import groovy.transform.builder.Builder
> import groovy.transform.builder.SimpleStrategy
> @Builder(builderStrategy = SimpleStrategy)
> class Animal {
>    String color
>     int legs
> }
> // Pet.groovy
> import groovy.transform.builder.Builder
> import groovy.transform.builder.SimpleStrategy
> @Builder(builderStrategy = SimpleStrategy)
> class Pet extends Animal {
>     String name
> }
> // PetTest.java
> import org.junit.Test;
> import static org.junit.Assert.*;
> public class PetTest {
>     @Test public void createPet() {
>         // Pet pet = new Pet().setColor("white").setLegs(4).setName("Bobby"); 
> does not compile
>         Pet pet = (Pet) new 
> Pet().setName("Bobby").setColor("white").setLegs(4);
>         assertTrue(pet.getLegs() == 4);
>     }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to