[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15907296#comment-15907296
]
Paul King commented on GROOVY-8116:
-----------------------------------
My understanding is that final isn't implicit for enums like it is for
interfaces. While it isn't an encouraged practice, I believe in Java you can
technically make a non-final instance field and have a mutable enum instance.
So, I think Groovy's current behavior is correct. Though I noticed that the
getter method on a final property retains the final modifier - which we
wouldn't normally do, though it isn't a big deal since inheritance of enums
isn't supported.
> Property generation for enum is incorrect
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-8116
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8116
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Eric Milles
>
> When creating a simple enum, I noticed that content assist was giving some
> strange results. It appears as though there is no special case handling for
> properties in an enum.
> {code}
> enum Suit {
> CLUBS(1), SPADES(1), HEARTS(2), DIAMONDS(2);
> int color
> Suit(int color) {
> this.color = color
> }
> }
> {code}
> Since this is an enum, the final modifier on color should not be necessary --
> it is implied. Java does not require it. However the generated field does
> not indicate final in the AST and a setter setColor is created. I checked
> this in the Groovy Console.
> {code}
> final public class Suit implements groovy.lang.GroovyObject extends
> java.lang.Enum<Suit> {
> final public static Suit HEARTS
> final public static Suit DIAMONDS
> final public static Suit SPADES
> final public static Suit CLUBS
> private int color
> ...
> public int getColor() {
> }
> public void setColor(int value) {
> }
> }
> {code}
> The method setColor is coming up in my IDE's content assist, since it is
> generated by the Verifier.visitProperty method. I think if the generated
> fields are indicated as final for enums then Verifier will not generate
> setters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)