Github user jespersm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/c24c0b7e6a67dcdf277207d4261cfa6f2b55031f#commitcomment-27233916
In
src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:
In
src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java
on line 4104:
Yes, but instead of adding a "fake" call method, you could modify the call
invocation to use the SAM's selector name instead.
I still think you should separate the two, I don't see why they need to be
coupled together -- the PR is big enough as it is.
---
