Keegan Witt created GROOVY-9717:
-----------------------------------
Summary: 3.0 stubs include packages annotations on classes other
than package-info.groovy
Key: GROOVY-9717
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9717
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Stub generator / Joint compiler
Reporter: Keegan Witt
{code:java}
@CustomAnnotation
package com.foo
Foo {}
@interface CustomAnnotation {}
{code}
Generates a stub that has {{@com.foo.CustomAnnotationpackage}} in _Foo.java_,
which javac won't compile because it requires package annotations to be in
_package-info.java_. Groovy 2.4 and 2.5 don't include this annotation in the
stub.
Ideally, the annotation would be included if in _package-info.groovy_, and
otherwise omitted. But if we had to, and always omitted it, it at least
wouldn't be a regression (assuming this difference wasn't made on purpose).
Possibly we should also consider having the Groovy compiler not allow
annotations on packages if not in package-info.groovy. I'm not clear what use
cases there are for using the annotation outside a package info file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
