[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17414904#comment-17414904
]
Daniel Sun commented on GROOVY-10224:
-------------------------------------
It let me recall the issue GROOVY-8409.
I am very glad it has been fixed, but there are some more area we have to pay
attention to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8409?focusedCommentId=16584731&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16584731
> No owner type of `ParameterizedType` of Java could be represented in
> `ClassNode`
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-10224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10224
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation, Static Type Checker
> Reporter: Daniel Sun
> Priority: Major
>
> {quote}
> Java5 treatment of ParameterizedType is incorrect: it doesn't take into
> account getOwnerType(). I've made ASM decompiler behave the same way for now.
> I don't know how to represent such types in ClassNode API.
> {quote}
>
> See https://github.com/groovy/groovy-core/pull/552
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
