[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Milles updated GROOVY-10501:
---------------------------------
Description:
Consider the following:
{code:java}
class Pojo {
public <T> Pojo(T t) {
}
}
{code}
Java supports explicit type arguments via: {{new <Type>Pojo(null)}}
If Groovy were to add support for this, then {{@Newify}} would need some
consideration as well for supporting this kind of thing.
was:
Consider the following:
{code:java}
class Pojo {
public <T> Pojo(T t) {
}
}
{code}
Java supports explicit type arguments via {{new <Type>Pojo(null)}}
If Groovy were to add support for this, then {{@Newify}} would need some
consideration as well for supporting this kind of thing.
> Java compat: support type arguments for constructor call
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-10501
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10501
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Eric Milles
> Priority: Minor
>
> Consider the following:
> {code:java}
> class Pojo {
> public <T> Pojo(T t) {
> }
> }
> {code}
> Java supports explicit type arguments via: {{new <Type>Pojo(null)}}
> If Groovy were to add support for this, then {{@Newify}} would need some
> consideration as well for supporting this kind of thing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
