[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17572153#comment-17572153
 ] 

Eric Milles edited comment on GROOVY-10706 at 7/28/22 3:35 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Both of these examples are problems for IDE integration with Java. I don’t have 
links directly at hand but can dig them up.

{code:groovy}
void p(Proxy proxy) { x }
{code}
Without an import to disambiguate between {{java.net.Proxy}} and 
{{groovy.util.Proxy}}, this code gives an ambiguous type error from the Java 
tooling.  Groovy selected {{java.net.Proxy}} because {{java.net.*}} was the 
first star import checked by {{ResolveVisitor}}.  This makes it difficult for 
the editor to present "Proxy" as an unknown type and offer both options in the 
quick fix dialog.

https://github.com/groovy/groovy-eclipse/issues/1354


was (Author: emilles):
Both of these examples are problems for IDE integration with Java. I don’t have 
links directly at hand but can dig them up.

{code:groovy}
void p(Proxy proxy) { x }
{code}
Without an import to disambiguate between `java.net.Proxy` and 
`groovy.util.Proxy`, this code gives an ambiguous type error from the Java 
tooling.  Groovy selected `java.net.Proxy` because `java.net.*` was the first 
star import checked by `ResolveVisitor`.  This makes it difficult for the 
editor to present "Proxy" as an unknown type and offer both options in the 
quick fix dialog.

https://github.com/groovy/groovy-eclipse/issues/1354

> Consider tightening of star import rules for type checked code
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-10706
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10706
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Static Type Checker
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> When faced we multiple star imports, dynamic Groovy has a rule whereby first 
> seen match wins. With type checking, we might want to consider tightening up 
> the rules and giving an error if duplicates are found, e.g.:
> {code}
> import java.awt.*;
> import java.util.*;
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> static void main(args) {
>   println List
> }
> {code}
> The Java equivalent would complain with something like:
> {noformat}
> error: reference to List is ambiguous
>         System.out.println(List.class);
>                            ^
>   both interface java.util.List in java.util and class java.awt.List in 
> java.awt match
> 1 error
> {noformat}
> This might have performance impacts though, so we'd need to investigate that 
> as part of the analysis.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to