[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17573495#comment-17573495
 ] 

Paul King commented on GROOVY-10710:
------------------------------------

Yes, we can look into an adapter. [~klv_m72] can you give me a failing test 
case that meets your conclusion of failing?

> operator == is broken for arrays
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-10710
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10710
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: groovy-runtime
>            Reporter: L
>            Priority: Major
>
> To perform checks likeĀ  a == b groovy runtime invokes method 
> DefaultTypeTransformation.compareEqual(Object left, Object right).
> This method is OK if both the left side and the right side are arrays. But it 
> is utterly broken if only one side of the comparison is an array:
>  # There are calls to primitiveArrayToList() *before* making sure whether 
> this is really necessary. This results in creation of most likely unnecessary 
> objects (lists). It is much better to perform more checks like 'whether the 
> other operand is a collection or array' and 'if so whether both left and 
> right operand have the same size'.
>  # The conversion with primitiveArrayToList() might also a break normal 
> equals() implementation which compareEqual(Object left, Object right) falls 
> back to if operands do not fall into the special cases. This is because the 
> original operands *are replaced* with results of primitiveArrayToList() and 
> equals() is invoked not on the original objects.
> This problem is present in the current 3.X, 4.X and 5.X versions of groovy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to