[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17584978#comment-17584978
]
Eric Milles edited comment on GROOVY-9127 at 8/25/22 6:39 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/47821d27aaa6d3a36a352ce54370d5aa4ad1441c
was (Author: emilles):
rework:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/47821d27aaa6d3a36a352ce54370d5aa4ad1441c
> Cannot set protected field from subclass
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-9127
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9127
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.5.6
> Reporter: paolo di tommaso
> Assignee: Daniel Sun
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-beta-2
>
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Consider the following code
> {code}
> @CompileStatic
> abstract class Foo {
> protected String field1
> String getField1() {
> field1
> }
> }
> @CompileStatic
> class Bar extends Foo {
> void changeField1() {
> this.field1 = 'foo'
> }
> @Override
> String getField1() { return 'bar command' }
> }
> {code}
> It fails to compile with the following error message:
> {code}
> [Static type checking] - Cannot set read-only property: field1
> @ line 29, column 9.
> this.field1 = 'foo'
> ^
> {code}
> Which does not make much sense to me because protected field should be
> accessible to subclasses by definition. Tested also with 2.5.8-SNAPSHOT
> reporting the same issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
