[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17946000#comment-17946000
]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-11610:
--------------------------------------
Should be all good. Let me know if you have a test that shows something else.
> Inner records are marked static in bytecode but are not recognized as static
> during compile
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-11610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11610
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compiler, Static compilation
> Affects Versions: 4.0.24
> Reporter: Saravanan
> Assignee: Eric Milles
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 4.0.27
>
>
> Nested record definitions are static by default in Java, but groovy treats
> them differently. The byte code generated respects this definition, but
> constructing the record in a groovy script creates a compile error (In static
> compilation)
> {code:java}
> Cannot find matching constructor
> com.Records.RecordTesting$MyRecord(com.Records.RecordTesting,
> java.lang.String). Please check if the declared type is correct and if the
> method exists{code}
>
> {code:java}
> package com.Records;
> public class RecordTesting {
> // This is static in the bytecode (which is correct behavior)
> public record MyRecord(String blah) {}
> public String create() {
> // This will cause a compile error (unless MyRecord was marked static)
> new MyRecord("blah").blah();
> }
> }
> {code}
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
