paulk-asert commented on PR #2156: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2156#issuecomment-2832009463
@codeconsole I agree this would be nice to have. We just have to weigh up all pros and cons. We treat breaking existing code seriously and such changes proceed more slowly due to the extra caution. We sometimes do it anyway when it is a clear win. We know in such cases that we have to be extra clear in our release notes and messaging. The particular aspect of breaking domain classes with no package is one that has bitten us before. I think it was in fact with Grails. Some folks had no package domain classes named Singleton and we introduced an annotation in groovy.lang which is auto-imported. (It was made worse by various other inject Singleton annotations too.) @eric-milles Are you still in favor? Did you want to do a VOTE/DISCUSS thread on the mailing list? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@groovy.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
