eric-milles opened a new pull request, #2580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2580
Should `map['key']` work like `map.key` or `map.get('key')`? In older
Groovy versions, `getAt(Map,Object)` was considered closer than
`getAt(Object,String)`. Adding `getAt(Map,String)` and `putAt(Map,String,V)`
restores alignment between `getAt` and `get` at the expense of the public
property handling for the subscript syntax.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
