[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18103193#comment-18103193
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-12238:
-----------------------------------------

testlens-app[bot] commented on PR #2771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2771#issuecomment-5234330511

   ## ✅ All tests passed ✅
   
   🏷️ Commit: 29c82d84d20e3783361cccf9bdb0cda77b7166a3
   ▶️ Tests:  108906 executed
   ⚪️ Checks: 31/31 completed
   
   ---
   _Learn more about TestLens at [testlens.app](https://testlens.app)._
   




> SecureASTCustomizer does not check constructors, initializer blocks or field 
> initializers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12238
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12238
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Assignee: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> h2. Problem
> {{SecureASTCustomizer}} visits the script statement block and method bodies 
> only. Code which lives outside a method body is never handed to the securing 
> visitor, so none of the configured restrictions apply to it - not 
> {{disallowedReceivers}}, not the statement or expression allow/deny lists, 
> and not any registered {{StatementChecker}} or {{ExpressionChecker}}.
> With {{disallowedReceivers = ['java.lang.System']}} configured, every one of 
> the following compiles and runs today, while the same call in the script body 
> is correctly rejected:
> {code:groovy}
> class A { A() { System.getProperty('x') } }              // constructor
> class B { static { System.getProperty('x') } }           // static initializer
> class C { { System.getProperty('x') } }                  // instance 
> initializer
> class D { def f = System.getProperty('x') }              // field initializer
> class E { static def f = System.getProperty('x') }       // static field 
> initializer
> @TupleConstructor(pre={ System.getProperty('x') })       // relocated into the
> class F { String s }                                     // generated 
> constructor
> {code}
> The existing filters cannot be reused to reach these, for three separate 
> reasons:
> * a static initializer block ends up inside a {{<clinit>}} method, and 
> {{<clinit>}} is *synthetic*, so it is excluded both by {{filterMethods}} and 
> by the {{!isSynthetic()}} test in the sibling-class loop;
> * instance initializer blocks live in 
> {{ClassNode.getObjectInitializerStatements()}}, a separate list which is 
> never read;
> * field initializers live in {{FieldNode.getInitialExpression()}}, and the 
> backing fields of Groovy properties are themselves *synthetic*, so the 
> synthetic flag cannot be used to filter them either.
> h2. Change
> Adds {{SecureASTCustomizer.visitConstructorsAndInitializers(ClassNode, 
> GroovyCodeVisitor)}}, called for every class in the module, which applies the 
> existing securing visitor to:
> * declared constructors (non-synthetic, with a body)
> * {{getObjectInitializerStatements()}}
> * the statements inside {{<clinit>}}
> * {{FieldNode.getInitialExpression()}}
> The method is {{protected}} so subclasses can adjust it, consistent with 
> {{createGroovyCodeVisitor}} and {{filterMethods}}.
> h2. Distinguishing generated code
> This is the part worth reviewing closely.
> Constructors and initializers are not written solely by the author of the 
> source being secured. The compiler generates constructors for every script 
> class, and AST transformations add constructors, fields and initializer 
> statements of their own. Checking those rejects valid programs rather than 
> restricting the author.
> A first cut which visited everything broke 4 of the 81 existing customizer 
> tests, all on generated code:
> {noformat}
> ConstructorCallExpressions are not allowed: super (context)
> Usage of variables of type [groovy.lang.Binding] is not allowed
> Indirect import checks prevents usage of expression   (x2)
> {noformat}
> Those are the script class's generated {{Script()}} and {{Script(Binding)}} 
> constructors - and they are *not* marked synthetic, so there is no flag 
> available to exclude them. The discriminator used instead is the source 
> position: a node is visited only when {{getLineNumber() > 0}}, expressed as 
> an {{isFromSource(ASTNode)}} helper. Generated nodes normally carry no source 
> position.
> Caveats a reviewer should weigh:
> * This is a heuristic, not a guarantee. There are ~220 {{setSourcePosition}} 
> calls in the main source; a transformation which copies a source position 
> onto a generated constructor, field initializer or initializer statement 
> would have that code checked. Nothing found in testing does so, and {{@Grab}} 
> looks safe by inspection - it injects via {{addStaticInitializerStatements}} 
> and {{addObjectInitializerStatements}} using {{stmt()}}/{{callX()}} helpers, 
> which do not set positions - but {{@Grab}} was not exercised directly. If the 
> heuristic misfires, the failure mode is a false rejection of a valid program, 
> not a silent hole.
> * The {{<clinit>}} method's wrapper {{BlockStatement}} is itself generated 
> even when its statements are not, so the filter has to be applied per 
> statement rather than to the method body. Applying it at the method level 
> leaves static initializer blocks open.
> h2. Authored code relocated into generated members
> A generated member may nonetheless *contain* code the author wrote, because a 
> transformation can move it there. {{@TupleConstructor(pre=...)}} and 
> {{@MapConstructor(pre=...)}} relocate the supplied closure body into the 
> constructor they generate. Dumping the AST at CANONICALIZATION shows what 
> happens:
> {noformat}
> @TupleConstructor(pre={ System.getProperty('x') })
>   ctor line=-1 synthetic=false
>     stmt[0] line=2   java.lang.System.getProperty(x)   <- authored, relocated 
> here
>     stmt[1] line=-1  (this.s = s)                      <- generated
> {noformat}
> The author's statement keeps the source position it had in the original 
> source. So a member with no source position of its own is filtered *statement 
> by statement* rather than skipped outright - the same treatment {{<clinit>}} 
> already needs. Without this, {{@TupleConstructor(pre=...)}} and 
> {{@MapConstructor(pre=...)}} escape the restrictions entirely.
> This also answers a question raised separately on GROOVY-12239, which 
> proposed visiting annotation members. Annotation members turn out to be the 
> wrong lever: by CANONICALIZATION the closure supplied to an annotation has 
> usually been *moved* - into a constructor or a method - where it remains 
> reachable by source position without touching annotations at all. 
> GROOVY-12239 was closed on that basis.
> h2. Testing
> {{SecureASTCustomizerTest}} goes from 39 to 49 tests:
> ||Test||Purpose||
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverInScriptBody}}|control; unchanged behaviour|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverInConstructor}}|closed gap|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverInStaticInitializer}}|closed gap|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverInObjectInitializer}}|closed gap|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverInFieldInitializer}}|closed gap|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverInStaticFieldInitializer}}|closed gap|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverMovedIntoGeneratedConstructor}}|{{@TupleConstructor(pre=...)}}
>  relocation|
> |{{testDisallowedReceiverMovedIntoGeneratedMapConstructor}}|{{@MapConstructor(pre=...)}}
>  relocation|
> |{{testGeneratedScriptConstructorsAreNotChecked}}|generated 
> {{super(Binding)}} stays exempt|
> |{{testTransformGeneratedConstructorIsNotChecked}}|{{@TupleConstructor}} 
> output stays exempt|
> Verified:
> * the five gap tests and the two relocation tests fail against unmodified 
> master and pass with the change; the script-body control passes in both
> * the two exemption tests pass in both, by design - they exist to stop a 
> later simplification from dropping the source-position check, which is the 
> property most likely to regress silently
> * probe scenarios run during development ({{@Singleton}}, {{@Immutable}}, 
> {{@TupleConstructor}}, {{@Canonical}}, {{@Lazy}}, {{@Delegate}}, traits, 
> enums, records, inner classes, user constructors) under both a 
> receiver-restriction config and an allow-list config showed results identical 
> to baseline
> * full test suite: 16553 tests, no failures
> h2. Compatibility
> This is a behavioural change: scripts which compile today under a 
> {{SecureASTCustomizer}} will be rejected if their constructors, initializers 
> or relocated closure bodies violate the configured restrictions. That is the 
> intent, but per 
> [COMPATIBILITY.md|https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/master/COMPATIBILITY.md]
>  it is a breaking change and wants a dev@ decision plus a major version. 
> Targeted at 6.0.
> Both {{Limitations}} sections - the user guide and the 
> {{SecureASTCustomizer}} javadoc - are updated in the same change, since they 
> currently document these gaps as behaviour.
> h2. Out of scope
> * *Annotation members* remain unvisited - see GROOVY-12239 for the audit and 
> the reasoning above.
> * *Synthetic methods* remain unvisited. A transformation may relocate 
> authored code there too: {{ConditionalInterruptibleASTTransformation}} moves 
> its condition into a method created by {{addSyntheticMethod}}, and applying 
> the same per-statement filter there would catch {{@ConditionalInterrupt}}. 
> That was prototyped and works, but it buys one annotation and "synthetic" 
> covers a great deal of compiler-generated code, so it deserves broader 
> evidence before shipping. Deliberately deferred.
> * *Constructors still do not count towards {{methodDefinitionAllowed}}*. 
> Their bodies are now checked, but declaring a constructor remains permitted. 
> Making constructors count is a second, separable breaking change.
> * *{{@ASTTest}} is unreachable on every path*, because its transformation 
> moves the closure out of the AST into node metadata and reconstructs it from 
> the raw source text.
> h2. Scope note
> {{SecureASTCustomizer}} is a best-effort grammar filter, not a security 
> boundary - see THREAT_MODEL.md sections 3, 9 and 11a. This change is 
> hardening which removes behaviour that is surprising to a developer following 
> the documentation; it does not alter that position, and a demonstrated bypass 
> remains by design rather than a vulnerability.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to