[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18111962#comment-18111962
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-12361:
-----------------------------------------

daniellansun commented on PR #2882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2882#issuecomment-5555679838

   This is a set of notes on the commit, offered with respect — the overall 
direction looks right to me.
   
   ## Overall impression
   
   The diagnosis and the production-side structure both seem sound to me.
   
   The trampoline encodings name the declaring class, return type, and 
parameter types in the constant pool (`CHECKCAST` / `INVOKE*` / `invokeExact`). 
A hidden class is still identity-visible to the defining loader, so 
`canResolveInvokeTypes` / Step 1 can succeed, the hidden class defines, and the 
first invoke throws `NoClassDefFoundError`. That reading of GROOVY-12361 
matches the bytecode in `InvokerBytecode`.
   
   A single sticky decline in `tryCreate` also feels like the right place to 
hold the invariant. Patching Step 1 alone would not be enough: Step 2 already 
refuses a hidden nest host via `HiddenClassDefiner.canAttemptPrivateLookup`, 
but Step 3 (classData) and Step 4 (visible artifact) could still emit 
uninvokable bytecode. Folding `isHidden()` into `loaderCanResolve` would 
similarly miss Step 2/4, which do not walk the method’s types.
   
   So the “code judo” here — four failure modes collapsed into one policy 
decline, with the reflective path remaining the fallback — is, in my view, the 
correct layer. I would not try to “fix” hidden types by asType-erasing 
classData so they can trampoline; that would add a third encoding for a case 
that has always been reflective.
   
   The comments in `tryCreate` / `allTypesNameable` are also very helpful: they 
explain *why* define succeeds and invoke fails, which is the non-obvious part.
   
   What I would be grateful to see tightened is mainly the tests (and one small 
layering point in `tryCreate`). I would not want to hold up the production 
idea; I would only suggest we lock the invariant a bit more firmly before 
landing.
   
   ## Suggestions
   
   ### 1. Consider treating the hidden-type check as a policy decline, next to 
the existing ones
   
   
```99:121:src/main/java/org/apache/groovy/internal/runtime/invoke/InvokerFactory.java
       public static DirectInvoker tryCreate(final CachedMethod method) {
           if (method == null || !generationAllowed()) {
               return null;
           }
           if (method.isCallerSensitive() || 
Modifier.isAbstract(method.getModifiers())) {
               return null;
           }
           try {
               if (!allTypesNameable(method.getCachedMethod())) {
                   // ...
                   return null;
               }
               return defineSteps(method);
           } catch (Exception | LinkageError ignored) {
   ```
   
   Caller-sensitive and abstract are already sticky policy declines *before* 
the `try`. Hidden types seem to be the same kind of decision — “please do not 
generate” — rather than a define/link failure. Sitting inside `catch (Exception 
| LinkageError)` slightly blurs that boundary, and `getCachedMethod()` (which 
may `setAccessible`) becomes a side effect of the predicate.
   
   Would it be reasonable to lift the check next to the other declines, and 
take `CachedMethod` the way `isPubliclyInvocableFromInvokerFactory` already 
does (`getDeclaringClass().getTheClass()`, `getReturnType()`, 
`getNativeParameterTypes()`)? That would also match the types `InvokerBytecode` 
actually writes, without calling `getCachedMethod()` only to inspect names.
   
   A small related thought: the class javadoc’s define-path list does not yet 
mention this precondition. A reader of `tryStep1` still sees “loader can 
resolve these types” and could reasonably think a public hidden nestmate is 
legal. A sentence next to the four steps might save the next reader a trip 
through GROOVY-12361.
   
   I would *not* suggest sprinkling `isHidden()` into `tryStep1` / `tryStep3` / 
`canResolveInvokeTypes` in addition to `tryCreate`. That would be the scattered 
version of this fix; the single gate is the cleaner model.
   
   ### 2. `testHiddenProxyStaysInvocablePastThreshold` may pass without 
exercising the bug
   
   
```502:518:src/test/groovy/org/apache/groovy/internal/runtime/invoke/InvokerFactoryTest.groovy
       @Test
       void testHiddenProxyStaysInvocablePastThreshold() {
           String old = System.getProperty(InvokerFactory.PROPERTY_THRESHOLD)
           System.setProperty(InvokerFactory.PROPERTY_THRESHOLD, '0')
           try {
               Object proxy = [name: { 'circle' }] as HiddenProxyBase
               // ...
               3.times { assertEquals('circle', name.invoke(proxy, new 
Object[0])) }
           } finally {
               if (old == null) 
System.clearProperty(InvokerFactory.PROPERTY_THRESHOLD)
               else System.setProperty(InvokerFactory.PROPERTY_THRESHOLD, old)
           }
       }
   ```
   
   This looks like the only test that walks the production hook 
(`CachedMethod.invoke` after the threshold), which is exactly the coverage we 
want. A few details made me slightly uneasy that it might stay green without 
generation ever running:
   
   - Every other property-mutating test in this file, and in 
`CachedMethodDirectInvokerTest`, uses 
`@ResourceLock(Resources.SYSTEM_PROPERTIES)`. This one does not. Under parallel 
execution, a sibling could restore the default threshold while this test is 
running. Then `hits > 1000` is never true, generation never runs, and three 
reflective invokes would still pass.
   - It never asserts `invokerAttempted` / `invoker == null`. The sticky-fail 
tests in this same file already do that 
(`testCachedMethodStickyFailsWhenAllDefineStepsFail`). Without those fields, 
“invoke still works” is not quite proof that the trampoline was refused.
   - Save/restore is inlined; `restoreProperty` is already the local helper.
   
   `testTryCreateDeclinesPublicHiddenHost` also splits `cm(ping)` across two 
instances, so the `invoke` after `tryCreate` is a fresh `CachedMethod` that 
never reaches threshold. That test still proves the factory returns null, which 
is valuable; it just does not prove the hook sticky-fails. The e2e test is the 
one that has to carry that load.
   
   If you agree, matching `CachedMethodDirectInvokerTest`’s `withThreshold(0L, 
…)` shape would make this much harder to go green accidentally: lock, one 
`CachedMethod`, invoke past threshold, assert sticky-fail, then invoke again.
   
   ### 3. The old Step 3 fall-through test may now be slightly misleading
   
   `testDefineStepsFallsThroughToClassDataForHiddenNonPublicHost` no longer 
tests fall-through. `tryCreate` returning null is a good assertion — it is the 
regression guard that a Step 1-only patch would miss. The second half then 
drives `tryCreateClassData` and asserts that an uninvokable trampoline still 
defines.
   
   I may be missing a reason to keep that second half; from the outside it 
looks like a dead production path. `testClassDataEncodingInvokesPublicMethod` 
already covers classData on types that can actually run. A “definition 
succeeds; do not invoke” fixture might document a landmine rather than remove 
it.
   
   Would you consider renaming to something like 
`testTryCreateDeclinesNonPublicHiddenHost`, keeping `assertNull(tryCreate(…))`, 
and dropping the `tryCreateClassData` success assertion?
   
   I realise that once hidden hosts cannot be the Step 3 fixture, the 
production `tryCreate → defineSteps → tryStep3` orchestration is only hit via 
the reflective `tryStep3` probe. That seems acceptable — I would only suggest 
that the test name and comments not claim to cover `defineSteps` fall-through 
any more.
   
   ## Things I would not chase in this commit
   
   - A shared “nameable type” helper. `CallSiteGenerator` has a similar 
constant-pool shape, but it is out of this commit and on the deprecated classic 
call-site path. If a second call site appears later, `HiddenClassDefiner` would 
be a more natural home than growing `InvokerFactory`.
   - Extra tests for hidden parameter/return types without a hidden declaring 
class. That shape is almost unreachable from Groovy source. Declaring-class 
coverage (public + non-public + map-coerced proxy) is the production case, and 
the three-type walk in `allTypesNameable` is still the right defensive check.
   
   ## Summary
   
   I think the production structure is the right one: one sticky decline at 
`tryCreate`, not a hidden-class special case in each define step. The notes 
above are about making that decline sit with the other policy gates, and about 
making the e2e test force generation under a property lock and assert 
sticky-fail, plus renaming the old Step 3 test so it no longer claims to cover 
`defineSteps` fall-through.
   
   Thank you for the careful comments in the factory — they made the failure 
mode much easier to follow.
   




> CachedMethod DirectInvoker: trampoline for a hidden declaring class throws 
> NoClassDefFoundError on first invoke
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12361
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12361
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Assignee: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> The generated {{DirectInvoker}} trampoline from GROOVY-12325 names the target 
> method's declaring class in its bytecode ({{CHECKCAST}} on the receiver, 
> {{INVOKEVIRTUAL}}/{{INVOKEINTERFACE}} on the declaring type, or the 
> {{invokeExact}} descriptor on the classData path). When that declaring class 
> is a *hidden class* (JEP 371), the name is not resolvable by any class 
> loader: the trampoline defines and initialises fine, but the first call 
> through it fails with {{NoClassDefFoundError}}. The error escapes 
> {{CachedMethod.invoke}} as-is because generation is sticky-successful and the 
> failure only happens at invocation time.
> Groovy itself produces hidden declaring classes: {{ProxyGeneratorAdapter}} 
> defines its proxies as hidden nestmates (GROOVY-12223) whenever the 
> superclass is on the same loader as Groovy, so any map-as-abstract-class 
> coercion of an application-classpath type is affected once the method has 
> been invoked {{groovy.cachedmethod.invoker.threshold}} times (default 1000).
> h3. Reproducer
> Precompile so that {{Shape}} sits next to the Groovy jar on the application 
> class path (a script compiled by {{GroovyClassLoader}} gets an ordinary, 
> non-hidden proxy and does not reproduce):
> {code:groovy}
> abstract class Shape { abstract String name() }
> class ProxyRepro {
>     static void main(String[] args) {
>         def s = [name: { 'circle' }] as Shape
>         println "hidden proxy: " + s.getClass().isHidden()
>         // two cold call sites share the CachedMethod; its hit count reaches 
> the
>         // trampoline threshold while each indy site is still below its own
>         600.times { assert s.name() == 'circle' }
>         600.times { assert s.name() == 'circle' }
>         println "ok"
>     }
> }
> {code}
> {noformat}
> $ java -cp groovy-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar 
> org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler -d out ProxyRepro.groovy
> $ java -cp groovy-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:out ProxyRepro
> hidden proxy: true
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
> Shape1_groovyProxy/0x0000007001120000
>       at 
> org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invokeGenerated(CachedMethod.java:491)
>       at 
> org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:452)
>       at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:298)
>       at 
> org.codehaus.groovy.vmplugin.v8.IndyInterface.invokeColdReflective(IndyInterface.java:650)
>       ...
> {noformat}
> A single call site masks the bug because the indy site promotes to the full 
> method-handle chain at the same hit count (1000) and stops going through 
> {{CachedMethod.invoke}}; two sites sharing the method, any MOP-path 
> invocation ({{invokeMethod}}, categories, per-instance metaclass, 
> {{@Delegate}} etc.), or {{-Dgroovy.cachedmethod.invoker.threshold=0}} exposes 
> it. Setting either {{-Dgroovy.indy.cold.reflection=false}} or 
> {{-Dgroovy.cachedmethod.invoker.disable=true}} avoids it. JDK 21, Groovy 
> master (6.0.0-SNAPSHOT).
> h3. Fix
> {{InvokerFactory.tryCreate}} should decline (sticky null, so 
> {{CachedMethod.invoke}} stays reflective) when the declaring class, the 
> return type or any parameter type (array components included) {{isHidden()}}. 
> All four define steps are affected, including Step 3 (classData), whose 
> {{invokeExact}} descriptor also names the type. 
> {{InvokerFactoryTest.testDefineStepsFallsThroughToClassDataForHiddenNonPublicHost}}
>  currently asserts the opposite and even notes that the resulting trampoline 
> must not be invoked; it needs to assert {{null}} instead. A fix with tests is 
> available on branch {{groovy12354spike}} (the {{allTypesNameable}} gate).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to