[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Sun updated GROOVY-12459:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
h2. Context

{{AsyncChannel}} is the channel used with {{async}} and {{for await}}. A 
producer sends values and then calls {{close()}} so the consumer can finish. 
That shape shipped with the channel API. Native async/await is GROOVY-9381. 
Later channel work includes GROOVY-12320 ({{ChannelSelect}}) and GROOVY-12343 
({{AsyncChannel.after}}).

The proposed change keeps that close and lets it carry the producer failure. 
The code that fails, and the code that reads, each write their own {{try}} / 
{{catch}}.

h2. Problem

{code:groovy}
def channel = AsyncChannel.create(2)

async {
    for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
        someCall()
        channel.send(i * i)
    }
    channel.close()
}

for await (value in channel) {
    println value
}
{code}

If {{someCall()}} throws, both of these happen:

* {{channel.close()}} never runs, so {{for await}} waits forever.
* The exception stays on the {{Awaitable}} returned by {{async}}. The example 
discards that handle, so the consuming code never sees the failure.

A {{try}} / {{finally}} inside the task, followed by {{await}} on the handle, 
fixes both symptoms, but the consumer is waiting on the channel, not on the 
handle. {{defer}} runs on the way out of the task, including when the task 
throws. A {{defer}} block that calls {{channel.close()}} closes the channel 
with no cause, so {{for await}} ends normally and the exception stays on the 
handle.

h2. Change

The producer catches the failure and closes with it. Values already sent are 
still delivered. {{receive}} and {{send}} then fail with 
{{ChannelClosedException}}, and that failure is the cause. {{for await}} throws 
the failure itself after those values, including a checked exception or an 
{{Error}}. The reader writes the {{try}} / {{catch}}, as with C# {{await 
foreach}}, JavaScript {{for await}}, and Swift {{for try await}}.

{code:groovy}
def channel = AsyncChannel.create(2)

async {
    try {
        for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
            someCall()
            await channel.send(i * i)
        }
        channel.close()
    } catch (Exception failure) {
        channel.close(failure)
    }
}

def seen = []
try {
    for await (value in channel) {
        seen << value
    }
} catch (Exception failure) {
    // failure is the exception thrown by someCall()
}
{code}

{{close(failure)}} returns nothing. {{null}} is a normal close. The first close 
wins.

||What happened||What the consumer sees||
|{{close()}}, or {{close(null)}}|{{ChannelClosedException}} with no cause. 
{{for await}} ends. {{ChannelSelect}} still treats this as a normal close.|
|{{close(failure)}} on a channel that retains it|{{receive}} and {{send}} fail 
with {{ChannelClosedException}} whose cause is {{failure}}. {{for await}} and 
{{ChannelSelect}} throw {{failure}} after the values already sent.|
|Every selected channel closed normally|{{ChannelSelect}} fails with a 
{{ChannelClosedException}} whose message is "all channels are closed".|
|A transfer already committed when another channel closes|That transfer stays 
the result. A withdrawn branch, and {{CancellationException}}, are not closes.|

{{filter}}, {{map}}, {{merge}}, {{split}}, and {{tap}} carry a source failure, 
or a failure thrown by the callback, through to their output. Closing one side 
of a {{split}} stops the split and closes the other side normally. A failure 
close of one side is not copied onto the other.

{{BroadcastChannel.close(failure)}} closes every subscriber the same way. {{for 
await}} on a subscriber throws that failure, and the publisher view reports it 
with {{onError}}.

{{getCloseCause()}} reports the retained failure, or {{null}} when the channel 
is open, was closed normally, or does not retain a cause.

h2. Compatibility

{{close(Throwable)}} and {{getCloseCause()}} are default methods, added after 
the 6.0.0 channel API. A class compiled against that API does not need to be 
recompiled and does not throw {{AbstractMethodError}}.

* The default {{close(Throwable)}} calls {{close()}} and does not retain the 
cause. {{for await}} on that channel ends. It does not throw the failure.
* The channel from {{AsyncChannel.create}} does retain the cause. {{close()}} 
and {{close(Throwable)}} share one close, so neither calls the other. The cause 
is stored before the closed flag, under the same lock.
* An implementation of {{close()}} must also override {{close(Throwable)}} if 
its {{close()}} calls that method. The default calls {{close()}} again.
* A resource that lives only inside an {{async}} task is unchanged. Release it 
with {{defer}}, and observe the task with {{await}} or with {{scope.async}} 
inside {{AsyncScope.withScope}}.


  was:
h2. Context

{{AsyncChannel}} is the channel used with {{async}} and {{for await}}. A 
producer often sends a few values and then calls {{close()}} so the consumer 
can finish. That shape shipped with the channel API. Native async/await is 
GROOVY-9381. Later channel work includes GROOVY-12320 ({{ChannelSelect}}) and 
GROOVY-12343 ({{AsyncChannel.after}}).

The proposed change teaches the channel to carry a producer failure on the same 
close signal the rest of the API already understands.

h2. Problem

{code:groovy}
def channel = AsyncChannel.create(2)

async {
    for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
        someCall()
        channel.send(i * i)
    }
    channel.close()
}

for await (value in channel) {
    println value
}
{code}

If {{someCall()}} throws, both of these happen:

* {{channel.close()}} never runs, so {{for await}} waits forever.
* The exception stays on the {{Awaitable}} returned by {{async}}. The example 
discards that handle, so nothing in the consuming code sees the failure.

A {{try}} / {{finally}} inside the task, followed by {{await}} on the handle, 
fixes both symptoms, but the consumer is waiting on the channel, not on the 
handle. A resource that exists only inside the task does not have this problem: 
{{defer}} already runs on the way out, and {{await}} on the handle reports the 
exception.

h2. Change

{{receive}} and {{send}} still end with {{ChannelClosedException}}. A retained 
failure is that exception's cause, not a second exception type. Buffered values 
are delivered first. The first close wins; a later close does not replace it.

||What happened||What the consumer sees||
|{{close()}}, or {{close(null)}}|{{ChannelClosedException}} with no cause. 
{{for await}} ends. {{ChannelSelect}} still treats this as a normal close.|
|{{close(failure)}} when the channel retains it|{{ChannelClosedException}} 
whose cause is {{failure}}. {{for await}} and {{ChannelSelect}} throw 
{{failure}} after values already sent.|
|A withdrawn {{ChannelSelect}} branch|Unchanged. It is not a close, so it stays 
silent.|

{{produce}} is the helper for the example above. It runs the body and then 
closes the channel. On success the body just returns. On failure it calls 
{{close(failure)}}.

* When that call returns {{true}}, receivers observe the failure and the 
returned {{Awaitable}} completes with {{null}}.
* When it returns {{false}}, the channel is still closed, so the consumer does 
not hang, and the {{Awaitable}} completes with the body exception.

{code:groovy}
def channel = AsyncChannel.create(2)

channel.produce { out ->
    for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
        someCall()
        out.send(i * i)
    }
}

for await (value in channel) {
    println value
}
{code}

{{filter}}, {{map}}, {{merge}}, {{split}}, and {{tap}} keep a normal upstream 
close as a normal close. An upstream failure is passed on with the same cause, 
so a later {{for await}} still sees it.

{{getCloseCause()}} only reports a failure the channel actually retained. The 
default is {{null}}.

h2. Compatibility

The new methods are default methods, added after the 6.0.0 channel API, so a 
class compiled against that API does not need to be recompiled and does not 
throw {{AbstractMethodError}}.

* {{close(null)}} delegates to {{close()}}. The return value still means this 
call closed the channel.
* {{close(failure)}} on that older class calls {{close()}} and returns 
{{false}}. The failure is not stored. {{produce}} then completes its 
{{Awaitable}} with the body exception.
* {{DefaultAsyncChannel}} stores the cause under the same lock as the closed 
flag and returns {{true}} only when receivers will observe it. {{close()}} and 
{{close(Throwable)}} both enter one private close, so neither calls the other.

A resource that lives only inside an {{async}} task is unchanged: release it 
with {{defer}}, and observe the task with {{await}} or with {{scope.async}} 
inside {{AsyncScope.withScope}}.



> Failed AsyncChannel producer never closes the channel so `for await` hangs 
> and the exception is dropped
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12459
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12459
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Daniel Sun
>            Priority: Major
>
> h2. Context
> {{AsyncChannel}} is the channel used with {{async}} and {{for await}}. A 
> producer sends values and then calls {{close()}} so the consumer can finish. 
> That shape shipped with the channel API. Native async/await is GROOVY-9381. 
> Later channel work includes GROOVY-12320 ({{ChannelSelect}}) and GROOVY-12343 
> ({{AsyncChannel.after}}).
> The proposed change keeps that close and lets it carry the producer failure. 
> The code that fails, and the code that reads, each write their own {{try}} / 
> {{catch}}.
> h2. Problem
> {code:groovy}
> def channel = AsyncChannel.create(2)
> async {
>     for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
>         someCall()
>         channel.send(i * i)
>     }
>     channel.close()
> }
> for await (value in channel) {
>     println value
> }
> {code}
> If {{someCall()}} throws, both of these happen:
> * {{channel.close()}} never runs, so {{for await}} waits forever.
> * The exception stays on the {{Awaitable}} returned by {{async}}. The example 
> discards that handle, so the consuming code never sees the failure.
> A {{try}} / {{finally}} inside the task, followed by {{await}} on the handle, 
> fixes both symptoms, but the consumer is waiting on the channel, not on the 
> handle. {{defer}} runs on the way out of the task, including when the task 
> throws. A {{defer}} block that calls {{channel.close()}} closes the channel 
> with no cause, so {{for await}} ends normally and the exception stays on the 
> handle.
> h2. Change
> The producer catches the failure and closes with it. Values already sent are 
> still delivered. {{receive}} and {{send}} then fail with 
> {{ChannelClosedException}}, and that failure is the cause. {{for await}} 
> throws the failure itself after those values, including a checked exception 
> or an {{Error}}. The reader writes the {{try}} / {{catch}}, as with C# 
> {{await foreach}}, JavaScript {{for await}}, and Swift {{for try await}}.
> {code:groovy}
> def channel = AsyncChannel.create(2)
> async {
>     try {
>         for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
>             someCall()
>             await channel.send(i * i)
>         }
>         channel.close()
>     } catch (Exception failure) {
>         channel.close(failure)
>     }
> }
> def seen = []
> try {
>     for await (value in channel) {
>         seen << value
>     }
> } catch (Exception failure) {
>     // failure is the exception thrown by someCall()
> }
> {code}
> {{close(failure)}} returns nothing. {{null}} is a normal close. The first 
> close wins.
> ||What happened||What the consumer sees||
> |{{close()}}, or {{close(null)}}|{{ChannelClosedException}} with no cause. 
> {{for await}} ends. {{ChannelSelect}} still treats this as a normal close.|
> |{{close(failure)}} on a channel that retains it|{{receive}} and {{send}} 
> fail with {{ChannelClosedException}} whose cause is {{failure}}. {{for 
> await}} and {{ChannelSelect}} throw {{failure}} after the values already 
> sent.|
> |Every selected channel closed normally|{{ChannelSelect}} fails with a 
> {{ChannelClosedException}} whose message is "all channels are closed".|
> |A transfer already committed when another channel closes|That transfer stays 
> the result. A withdrawn branch, and {{CancellationException}}, are not 
> closes.|
> {{filter}}, {{map}}, {{merge}}, {{split}}, and {{tap}} carry a source 
> failure, or a failure thrown by the callback, through to their output. 
> Closing one side of a {{split}} stops the split and closes the other side 
> normally. A failure close of one side is not copied onto the other.
> {{BroadcastChannel.close(failure)}} closes every subscriber the same way. 
> {{for await}} on a subscriber throws that failure, and the publisher view 
> reports it with {{onError}}.
> {{getCloseCause()}} reports the retained failure, or {{null}} when the 
> channel is open, was closed normally, or does not retain a cause.
> h2. Compatibility
> {{close(Throwable)}} and {{getCloseCause()}} are default methods, added after 
> the 6.0.0 channel API. A class compiled against that API does not need to be 
> recompiled and does not throw {{AbstractMethodError}}.
> * The default {{close(Throwable)}} calls {{close()}} and does not retain the 
> cause. {{for await}} on that channel ends. It does not throw the failure.
> * The channel from {{AsyncChannel.create}} does retain the cause. {{close()}} 
> and {{close(Throwable)}} share one close, so neither calls the other. The 
> cause is stored before the closed flag, under the same lock.
> * An implementation of {{close()}} must also override {{close(Throwable)}} if 
> its {{close()}} calls that method. The default calls {{close()}} again.
> * A resource that lives only inside an {{async}} task is unchanged. Release 
> it with {{defer}}, and observe the task with {{await}} or with 
> {{scope.async}} inside {{AsyncScope.withScope}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to