[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18132468#comment-18132468
 ] 

Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-11916:
--------------------------------------

I was looking at something similar to this and realized that Groovy up to 4 
also let you import private members.  So there was some change in this area in 
Groovy 5.  I'm not sure if any documentation was updated to indicate the rules. 
 There are probably some other access scenarios that would come up like public 
members of an inaccessible type.

> Star imports should not resolve package-private types
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11916
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> Groovy's star import resolution (e.g., import java.util.*) currently includes 
> package-private classes in name resolution. On modern JDKs (9+) with the 
> module system, these classes cannot actually be used — attempts result in 
> IllegalAccessError at runtime. This can lead to confusing errors and 
> inconsistency with Java's behaviour where star imports only resolve public 
> types.
> For example, import java.util.* allows def cls = TimSort to compile 
> (resolving the package-private java.util.TimSort), but any actual usage 
> (instanceof, construction, method calls) fails at runtime with 
> IllegalAccessError.
> {code:groovy}
> import java.util.*
> assert String.modifiers == 17
> def cls = TimSort     // fine
> assert cls.modifiers == 0
> println cls           // => class java.util.TimSort
> println Class.forName('java.util.TimSort') // => class java.util.TimSort
> println new Object() instanceof TimSort // IllegalAccessError
> {code}
> Having said that, as a counter example, is it really any different than being 
> able to get the class via Class.forName?
> If the Java behavior is deemed correct, the fix would be to filter non-public 
> classes during star import resolution in ResolveVisitor, producing a clean 
> compile-time error instead of a runtime error. This is technically a breaking 
> change but only affects code that was already failing at runtime on modular 
> JDKs.
> This also benefits the import module feature (GROOVY-11896), which expands to 
> star imports — filtering at the resolution level means module imports 
> correctly include only public types, matching Java's import module semantics.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to