[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18135625#comment-18135625
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-12613:
-----------------------------------------

codeconsole opened a new pull request, #3140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/3140

   In a trait method, every compound assignment `a op= b` was rewritten to `a = 
a op b`, so its target was evaluated twice:
   
   ```groovy
   trait T {
       def m() { def l = [0, 0]; int i = 0; l[i++] += 1; [i, l] }
   }
   class C implements T {}
   assert new C().m() == [1, [1, 0]]   // was [2, [1, 0]]; a class method gives 
[1, [1, 0]]
   ```
   
   4.0.33, 5.0.8 and 6.0.0 behave the same. `NAryOperationRewriter` does this 
rewrite so that a compound assignment to a trait field can become a 
field-helper getter and setter call. It applied it to every target, so for a 
local, a subscript or another object's property it changed the evaluation order 
and count: `l[i++] += 1` incremented `i` twice and `map[key()] += 1` called 
`key()` twice. The rewriter now leaves a compound assignment unchanged unless 
its target is a trait field or a `this.`-qualified trait field 
(`isInternalFieldAccess`, the same check the prefix and postfix rejection 
uses). Compound assignment to private, public and static trait fields and to 
trait properties is rewritten as before.
   
   #3130 (GROOVY-12603) also changes 
`NAryOperationRewriter.transformBinaryExpression`, to visit closures; whichever 
lands second keeps this unconditional field check and drops the closure-only 
one there.
   
   ## Tests
   
   `TraitASTTransformationTest.testCompoundAssignmentEvaluatesTargetOnce` fails 
without the change in dynamic, `@TypeChecked` and `@CompileStatic` modes. 
`testCompoundAssignmentOfTraitFieldOrProperty` covers compound assignment to 
trait fields and properties in the same three modes. 
`org.codehaus.groovy.transform.traitx`, `groovy.transform.stc`, 
`org.codehaus.groovy.classgen.asm.sc`, `gls.innerClass`, `PackedClosure*` and 
`groovy.ThisAndSuperTest` pass. The Checkstyle and CodeNarc gates pass.
   




> Compound assignment in a trait method evaluates its target twice when the 
> target is not a trait field
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-12613
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-12613
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.33, 5.0.8, 6.0.0
>            Reporter: Scott Murphy Heiberg
>            Priority: Major
>
> {code:groovy}
> trait T {
>     def m() { def l = [0, 0]; int i = 0; l[i++] += 1; [i, l] }
> }
> class C implements T {}
> assert new C().m() == [1, [1, 0]]
> {code}
> Actual: {{new C().m()}} returns {{[2, [1, 0]]}}. The index expression runs 
> twice. The same method in a class returns {{[1, [1, 0]]}}. The receiver or 
> subscript of any compound assignment in a trait method is evaluated twice, 
> for example a map subscript key() is called twice. This happens with and 
> without @CompileStatic / @TypeChecked.
> Expected: {{[1, [1, 0]]}}. A compound assignment evaluates its target once, 
> as it does in a class.
> Cause: the trait transformation (NAryOperationRewriter) rewrites every 
> compound assignment in trait code into a plain assignment (a = a op b). The 
> rewrite is only needed when the target is a trait field, which becomes a 
> field-helper getter/setter call.
> Seen in 4.0.33, 5.0.8 and 6.0.0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)

Reply via email to