[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14520673#comment-14520673
 ] 

Paul King edited comment on GROOVY-7406 at 4/30/15 1:26 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

I can see code within master, the 2_4_X and 2_1_X branches for handling JUnit 3 
suites but nothing for JUnit 4 suites. I don't see the String 
"JUnit4TestAdapter" anywhere in the source trees for those branches. I agree it 
would be nice to add support for JUnit 4 suites, just a little puzzled over 
what might be going on in your 2.1.7 environment.


was (Author: paulk):
I can see code within master, the 2_4_X and 2_1_X branches for handling JUnit 3 
suites but nothing for JUnit 4 suites. I don't see the String 
"JUnit4TestAdapter" anywhere in either source tree. I agree it would be nice to 
add support for JUnit 4 suites, just a little puzzled over what might be going 
on in your 2.1.7 environment.

> AntBuilder can't run a pure JUnit4 task, whereas Ant can do
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-7406
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7406
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Ant integration
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.3
>            Reporter: Gert Großmann
>
> If you have a pure JUnit4 test suite with @RunWith(Suite.class) and 
> @Suite.SuiteClasses({ ... }) and try to execute this via AntBuilder() no 
> tests can be executed because it states 'No tests found in ...'
> An equivalent Ant 1.9.4 <junit> task with the same compiled test suite finds 
> the tests.
> I didn't had the issue with Groovy 2.1.7. But it seems this version added a 
> suite() method with a JUnit4TestAdapter.
> If you add
> {code}
> public static Test suite() { return JUnit4TestAdapter(<testclass>)}
> {code}
> to your test suite everything works fine even in Groovy 2.4.3.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to