Mmuzaf commented on a change in pull request #7984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7984#discussion_r529592983



##########
File path: 
modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/persistence/defragmentation/TimeTracker.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package 
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.defragmentation;
+
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import org.apache.ignite.internal.util.typedef.internal.U;
+
+/** */
+public class TimeTracker<Stage extends Enum<Stage>> {

Review comment:
       I think we shouldn't have classes with 'almost the same behaviour'. 
   
   1. AFAIK, the `TimeBag` collects all the results per each Stage and then 
aggregates it. If you write a custom aggregate function will you get the same 
result as the `TimeTracker` does?
   
   1. Why do we need any aggregated results? Can we dump raw timings to log and 
aggregate than by some external tool (log-parser)? I think raw results would 
provide much valuable debug information




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to