ptupitsyn commented on code in PR #10214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/10214#discussion_r954047932
##########
modules/platforms/dotnet/Apache.Ignite.Core/Impl/Binary/SerializableSerializer.cs:
##########
@@ -603,13 +597,33 @@ private static object ReadAsCustomType(Type customType,
SerializationInfo serInf
{
var ctorFunc =
SerializableTypeDescriptor.Get(customType).SerializationCtor;
- var customObj = ctorFunc(serInfo, ctx);
+ var customObj = ctorFunc != null
+ ? ctorFunc(serInfo, ctx)
+ : FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(customType);
var wrapper = customObj as IObjectReference;
- return wrapper == null
+ var resObj = wrapper == null
? customObj
: wrapper.GetRealObject(ctx);
+
+ // Special case: type is replaced, but there is no serialization
ctor.
+ // Example: StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase.
+ if (ctorFunc == null)
+ {
+ // Cached internally.
+ var members =
FormatterServices.GetSerializableMembers(resObj.GetType());
Review Comment:
`SerializableSerializer` handles `ISerializable` types only. If a member of
such type is marked with `[NonSerialized]`, it is skipped during serialization.
This is what `GetSerializableMembers` does - returns all members that do not
have `[NonSerialized]` attribute.
We are just following the same logic as the built-in binary serializer has.
It should be noted that this serialization system is [deprecated in .NET
5+](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/compatibility/core-libraries/5.0/binaryformatter-serialization-obsolete).
`ISerializable` is mostly implemented by standard library types, and we should
support those types correctly.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]