alievmirza commented on code in PR #1429:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/1429#discussion_r1050444373
##########
modules/table/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/table/distributed/storage/InternalTableImpl.java:
##########
@@ -1324,4 +1338,23 @@ protected CompletableFuture<ClusterNode>
evaluateReadOnlyRecipientNode(int partI
}
});
}
+
+ /**
+ * Wraps {@code ReplicationException} or {@code ConnectException} with
{@code TransactionException}.
Review Comment:
Let's use {@link} here
##########
modules/runner/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/runner/app/ItIgniteNodeRestartTest.java:
##########
@@ -813,9 +812,9 @@ public void testOneNodeRestartWithGap() {
assertNotNull(table);
- assertThrowsWithCause(() -> table.keyValueView().get(null,
Tuple.create().set("id", 0)), TimeoutException.class);
+ assertThrows(TransactionException.class, () ->
table.keyValueView().get(null, Tuple.create().set("id", 0)));
Review Comment:
Should we check here the cause of an exception?
##########
modules/runner/src/integrationTest/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/runner/app/ItIgniteNodeRestartTest.java:
##########
@@ -813,9 +812,9 @@ public void testOneNodeRestartWithGap() {
assertNotNull(table);
- assertThrowsWithCause(() -> table.keyValueView().get(null,
Tuple.create().set("id", 0)), TimeoutException.class);
+ assertThrows(TransactionException.class, () ->
table.keyValueView().get(null, Tuple.create().set("id", 0)));
- createTableWithData(ignite, TABLE_NAME_2, 1, 1);
+ createTableWithoutData(ignite, TABLE_NAME_2, 1, 1);
Review Comment:
why do we need to change the logic of the test?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
