hpcnt-min-k commented on PR #7417: URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/7417#issuecomment-3875401531
@ptupitsyn Thank you for your response. I have a few questions. Q1. I previously confirmed through the PR below (https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/5263) that the EXPIRE AT feature has been removed from Table DDL. It seems there are no plans to support this. If that's the case, I'm curious what alternatives exist for EXPIRE AT. Q2. Isn't this PR essentially the same as the DDL EXPIRE AT? I'm curious about the differences. Also, is there a reason this is only being implemented for .NET? Supporting it only in specific languages feels like handling TTL on the client side rather than supporting it at the Ignite Cluster level, which is why I'm asking. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
