sunjincheng created IOTDB-1459:
----------------------------------
Summary: Unified the naming of test class
Key: IOTDB-1459
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1459
Project: Apache IoTDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Test
Reporter: sunjincheng
Fix For: 0.13.0
At present, the naming of some test classes is not uniform，such as, `IT` vs
`ITCase`, e.g.:
1.
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/server/src/test/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/integration
(end with `IT`).
2.
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/flink-tsfile-connector/src/test/java/org/apache/iotdb/flink/tsfile
(end with `ITCase`).
BTW: The test issue is also involved here, as follows:
-
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/9bbea3deee0ad7a382fb509d905a79ce44f4208d/pom.xml#L909
-
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/9bbea3deee0ad7a382fb509d905a79ce44f4208d/pom.xml#L922
The open question is:
I am not pretty sure about which one is best of `Test` vs `TaseCase` and `IT`
vs `ITCase` ,but we should chose one uniform naming format.
Refer to other communities:
[1] Flink(xxITCase):
https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-table/flink-table-planner-blink/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/planner/runtime/stream/table
[2] Spark(xxxSuite):
https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/master/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql
For me, there are not the best one, only the most suitable, and the choice of
our iotdb community. What's your thoughts. :)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
