Arsnael commented on PR #2583: URL: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2583#issuecomment-2586330223
> Anyway removing > is not really important. An end user might disagree with you on that I think :) Honestly I get that removing entirely the trailings `>` is tricky and might require a non efficient process as you need to be careful with initial `>` potentially present in the message (and you don't want to break the <mark> tags) I would be ok with the initial solution, aka folding `>>>>>` into `>` but need to fix current breaking related tests. @chibenwa what are your thoughts here? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: notifications-h...@james.apache.org
