> @@ -434,8 +434,6 @@ limitations under the License.
> <feature version='${project.version}'>jclouds-blobstore</feature>
> <feature version='${project.version}'>jclouds-management</feature>
> <bundle
> dependency='true'>mvn:net.schmizz/sshj/${sshj.version}</bundle>
> - <!-- not currently available as bundles - see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1728 and SMX4-1729 -->
> -
> <bundle>wrap:mvn:com.jcraft/jsch.agentproxy.jsch/${jsch.agentproxy.version}</bundle>
>
> <bundle>wrap:mvn:com.jcraft/jsch.agentproxy.sshj/${jsch.agentproxy.version}</bundle>
> <bundle
> dependency='true'>mvn:com.jcraft/jsch.agentproxy.connector-factory/${jsch.agentproxy.version}</bundle>
> <bundle
> dependency='true'>mvn:com.jcraft/jsch.agentproxy.usocket-nc/${jsch.agentproxy.version}</bundle>
@iocanel: what's the recommended practice here? This dep is not listed
_explicitly_ in the POM, but it **is** a dep of the project as it's a
transitive dep of connector-factory (which _is_ listed in the POM).
Is it better to list any dependency that appears here (i.e. a `<bundle
dependency='true'>` entry) as an explicitly dependency in the POM, or is it OK
to use entries here to refer to transitive deps that are not mentioned in the
POM?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/43/files#r11718293
