Thanks, @andrewgaul! One thing I noticed was that there are a couple of cases (I commented on two but didn't check further) where we are replacing `X.valueOf` with `X.parseX` even though the required value is actually the wrapper object (as returned by `valueOf`), not the primitive as returned by `parseX`.
Is there any benefit to doing so? Otherwise, it seems to me that using the parsing method that actually returns the required type, and not relying on autoboxing, would be more logical? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/498#issuecomment-53658104
