The harm I'm not sure you are aware of is that people supply a value to
this, and it isn't implemented. Without changing existing providers to
throw, or some algo to make it work, a user calling this could be making a
disasterous mistake in policy assumption.

That said, this is probably an already broken contract. For example there
are probably othet parts of this class that are silently ignored. But then
again.. broken windows shouldn't justify new ones.

Anyway, you make the call. If it were me, I would add a disclaimer or Beta
and who supports this on the method until we actually sort out how to
address the others. That said, I don't feel strongly enough to say don't
merge as I do see the pragmatic value in allowing one provider to escape
labs.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/567#issuecomment-58689192

Reply via email to