[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14293257#comment-14293257
]
Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-689:
----------------------------------------
The SecurityGroup Extension has been removed from GCE, as the implementation
was completely wrong (see
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/119). This issue will be
taken into account when building an appropriate firewall abstraction that
properly matches how GCE works.
> Be able to name firewall rules
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: JCLOUDS-689
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-689
> Project: jclouds
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jclouds-compute, jclouds-labs-google
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: Sunil Shah
> Labels: google-compute-engine
>
> It looks like the IpPermission class/builder doesn't offer the ability to
> name firewall rules. It'd be nice to be able to name these so that in GCE,
> it's quicker/easier to know what rules are present.
> We use it as follows:
> {code}
> IpPermission.builder()
> .ipProtocol(protocol)
> .cidrBlock(cidr)
> .fromPort(number)
> .toPort(number)
> .build()
> {code}
> At the moment we see:
> http://imgur.com/k0wEy9r
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
