It is not needed, as we're not distributing it, but I see no problem in having the file in the repo. Even if not an ASF release, people downloading the tarball from GitHub will already have the license file, and that's not bad (we already have the license headers in all files, so it makes sense to have the license too).
I'd only change the file to be in plain text instead of markdown and rename it to `LICENSE` (upper case), to match the general conventions for this file. Apart from that, the change lgtm. Thanks @danbroudy! --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/73#issuecomment-92287028
