> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ permalink: /releasenotes/ > > The Release Notes and Javadocs for every major release of Apache jclouds are > listed chronologically below. > > +* [1.9.2](/releasenotes/1.9.2) | [Javadoc](/reference/javadoc/1.9.x/)
> Should we deploy all missing versions? Good question. I think we have a couple of options here: * Point the A.B.x Javadoc link to A.B.0, which seems to be the case with 1.9.x now. But then we should probably change the link from `A.B.x` to `A.B.0`? * Update the A.B.x Javadoc to point to the latest release, i.e. overwrite the 1.9.0 Javadoc with 1.9.2, and keep the `1.9.x` link. This seems most consistent with the name of the link * Publish Javadoc for all the versions, and then change the links accordingly @nacx What do you think..? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/176/files#r49949136
