> can be to try to keep jclouds-examples in sync with latest release instead of > the bleeding edge master. wdyt?
I think that was exactly the intention, and that we've simply fallen behind ;-) So definitely a +1 on that from me. Many thanks for helping get this back up-to-date! --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/88#issuecomment-236172507
