Hello! > How close would you say we are to closing this PR
I'd say it's long overdue! Seeing your live tests passing from your gist, I'd say the impl addresses the contract required by the `ComputeService`. Just some last nitpicks like that [overriden toString](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/292#discussion_r79763475), and the [formatting in pom](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/292#discussion_r79763965). Otherwise, I'd say this LGTM. /cc @nacx PR now yours for last review? --- What're your plans btw after this gets merged? I'd personally like to see: - Arbitrary CPU/RAM support, as this is [now supported](https://jclouds.apache.org/blog/2016/08/22/arbitrary-cpu-ram/) - [JCLOUDS-1082](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1082) Firewall configurations - [JCLOUDS-1083](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1083) Inbound port configurations -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/292#issuecomment-251289003
