thanks for taking time to address my comments and give your opinion on jclouds network @nacx
thanks @geomacy for the great comment on the multi nics scenario. I'm still slightly concerned about giving multiple options using the template options (portable and custom) to do something similar. I think javadoc is good, but maybe this advanced support for multi subnets should documented on the readme and potentially jclouds.org website, not in this pr anyway. wdyt? --- As a side note, the more I think about things like > If no options are set, jclouds will create a default network and a subnet as > it did in previous versions, allocate a private and a public ip and attach > them to a NIC attached to the node. the more I think we need a `jclouds network` abstraction as those assumptions are not immediate and not consistent across jclouds -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/386#issuecomment-297834029
