GitHub user jhawkinson opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/libcloud/pull/1194

    Libcloud 986: Fixing the previous patch

    ## Libcloud 986: Fixing the previous patch
    
    ### Description
    A slight update to the way the ex_prefix option is applied ot the 
parameters in the iterate container objects.  It seems as if the prefix is 
there and is None.  The iterate objects returns an empty list. 
    
    ### Status
     done, ready for review
    
    ### Checklist (tick everything that applies)
    
    - [x ] [Code 
linting](http://libcloud.readthedocs.org/en/latest/development.html#code-style-guide)
 (required, can be done after the PR checks)
    - [ ] Documentation
    - [x] [Tests](http://libcloud.readthedocs.org/en/latest/testing.html)
    - [ ] 
[ICLA](http://libcloud.readthedocs.org/en/latest/development.html#contributing-bigger-changes)
 (required for bigger changes)


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jhawkinson/libcloud LIBCLOUD-986

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/libcloud/pull/1194.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1194
    
----
commit 735c9e645a067da48192f4846502fd50e1feef0b
Author: jhawk <jhawkinson@...>
Date:   2018-03-21T19:08:02Z

    LIBCLOUD-986: Add prefix option to azure blob list and iterate container 
methods

commit 2d78276d3d86e02461d473558163b2ca0c6768c4
Author: jhawk <jhawkinson@...>
Date:   2018-03-23T17:34:03Z

    LIBCLOUD-986: Fixing a bug in the previous fix

----


---

Reply via email to