[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16308536#comment-16308536
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-2170:
--------------------------------------

Is the module name redundant with the file name? I, for one, am quite used to 
seeing the file names. I would imagine others are as well...

> Capture module information in extended stack trace
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-2170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2170
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Layouts
>    Affects Versions: 2.10.0
>            Reporter: Ralph Goers
>            Assignee: Ralph Goers
>
> Log4j captures the jar name and version of each class listed in a stack trace 
> element. With Java 9 the StackTraceElement also includes the module name and 
> module version. These should be included in the stack trace, possibly instead 
> of the file name.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to