[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17459349#comment-17459349
 ] 

Lucy Menon commented on LOG4J2-3221:
------------------------------------

Hi [~rpopma], thank you for investigating and releasing the new CVE! I noticed 
that the new CVE shared on the 
[d...@logging.apache.org|mailto:d...@logging.apache.org] mailing list only 
mentions that this vector provides DOS in log4j 2.15.0 - there is no 
documentation that it allows the exploitation of CVE-2021-44228 in <2.15.0 in 
some environments even when the recommended mitigation of applying 
log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true is applied.  I just wanted to point this out in 
case the recommended mitigation for CVE-2021-44228 should be amended to specify 
this.

> JNDI lookups in layout (not message patterns) enabled in Log4j2 < 2.16.0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-3221
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3221
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lucy Menon
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.16.0
>
>
> The mitigation advice for CVE-2021-4428 suggests that for Log4j > 2.10.0 and 
> < 2.15.0, the vulnerability can be avoided by setting 
> -{{{}Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true{}}} or upgrading to 2.15.0. However, 
> many users may not be aware that even in this case, lookups used in layouts 
> to provide specific pieces of context information will still recursively 
> resolve, possibly triggering JNDI lookups. In order to avoid 
> attacker-controlled JNDI lookups, users must also either:
>  * Ensure that no such lookups resolve to attacker-provided data
>  * Ensure that the the JndiLookup class is not loaded
>  * Upgrade to log4j2 2.16.0 (untested)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to