[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17464661#comment-17464661
]
Michael Vorburger commented on LOG4J2-3282:
-------------------------------------------
I understand that this would also be possible (as e.g. [suggested
here|https://stackoverflow.com/a/28020760/421602]) with {{log4j-to-slf4j}} +
{{slf4j-jdk14}} (and {{slf4j-api}}) but I would prefer to have a Log4j "native"
bridge.
> log4j-to-jul Bridge
> -------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-3282
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3282
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.17.0
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.17.1
>
>
> I (we, internal project at work) would like to have a {{{}log4j-to-jul{}}}.
> So the "opposite" of [https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-jul/] (from
> [https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/tree/master/log4j-jul]). The use
> case here is if one has an existing JUL-based set-up into which you would
> like to see logs from a library that has been coded against the Log4j API.
> Poking around
> [https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/tree/master/log4j-to-slf4j/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/slf4j],
> I hope this won't be very hard to do, unless I'm missing something. I want
> log4j-to-jul to only depend on log4j-api and nothing else, notably NOT
> log4j-core.
> Please assign this issue to me so that I can work on this and contribute it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
