garydgregory commented on pull request #683: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/683#issuecomment-1081036428
Hello @atulpendse In general, you want to avoid breaking binary compatibility, so that means not editing public and protected type names and method signatures. This is critical in the log4j-api module and less so in others, but, in this case it seems easy to do. Also, we have been switching from factory methods to builders as we go from release to release in order to avoid keeping on deprecating factory methods. So edit or add builders, don't edit factory methods is the idea. TY! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
