[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17520421#comment-17520421
 ] 

Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-3472:
-------------------------------------

Is there a reason the wait strategy cannot be a plugin? If so the strategy name 
could be specified as either an attribute of the configuration element or as a 
standalone element beneath it (at the same level as Appenders, Proeprties, and 
Loggers).

> Allow configuration of custom Disruptor WaitStrategy
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-3472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3472
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Configuration, Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.17.2
>            Reporter: Remko Popma
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.17.3
>
>
> See also LOG4J2-2858.
> Currently Log4j allows a fixed set of disruptor WaitStrategies to be 
> configured. The current code has two drawbacks:
>  * the fixed set does not include all built-in WaitStrategies that the 
> disruptor library provides
>  * the configuration does not allow custom implementations of the 
> {{com.lmax.disruptor.WaitStrategy}} interface.
> h4. Proposal:
> Introduce a {{org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.WaitStrategyProvider}} 
> interface. Users may configure instances of this interface by setting system 
> property {{log4j2.asyncWaitStrategyProvider}}.
> Proposed implementation is to modify {{DisruptorUtil::createWaitStrategy}} to 
> check for the existence of this system property, before doing anything else. 
> If this property exists and a class can be instantiated based on the value of 
> this property, and the resulting WaitStrategyProvider instance provides a 
> non-null {{com.lmax.disruptor.WaitStrategy}} instance, then this waitstrategy 
> is returned from  {{DisruptorUtil::createWaitStrategy}}. Otherwise, we fall 
> back to the existing logic.
> Note that for simplicity I do not propose to have separate system properties 
> for Async Loggers and Async LoggerConfigs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to