HannesWell commented on PR #1429: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/1429#issuecomment-1623111659
> @HannesWell this is the issue we talked about, where the activation policies are missing for the automatic bundle start Thanks for the link. This change looks good to me. This really simplifies using log4j-2 in OSGi/Eclipse-based applications. 👍🏽 Additionally the activation policy should also be added to the log4j-to-slf4j bundle: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/83bba1bc322e80e7e95edbebc2383f2724dbe0de/log4j-to-slf4j/pom.xml#L98-L102 @ppkarwasz could you please have a look at this one? @N1k145 what might be missing is a change-log entry. I think if you create one like in https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/1375, this should speed-up the review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
