vy opened a new issue, #2106: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2106
As @ppkarwasz remarks [here](https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2104#pullrequestreview-1786736399) in #2104, > I start to wonder how useful is it to fill `log4j-api` with partial implementations. For example a recycled `LogBuilder` is useful for `log4j-core`, but not so much for `log4j-to-slf4j`. If `log4j-to-slf4j` is bound to Logback, the Log4j API builder will be recycled, but the underlying SLF4J builder won't. We might as well remove `Recycler` from `AbstractLogger` and move it into `core.Logger`. Hence this ticket. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
