rgoers commented on PR #2175: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2175#issuecomment-1885004387
I would classify the breakage a little differently. We can expect that applications will upgrade the log4j version but still have dependencies on libraries compiled against the log4j 2 api. Those applications MUST continue to work. I am less concerned about minor changes in core that are resolved by a simple recompile as MOST applications will be recompiling to pick up Log4j 3.x anyway. If we can use the interface approach to resolve migrate to j.u.f.Supplier I would be fine with that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
