vy commented on issue #1532: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1532#issuecomment-2222302314
> It will still be somewhat relevant, because object monitors are expected to remain less performant on VT (see Ron's comment on https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/2024-July/006885.html). That said, it probably won't be critical enough to warrant a backport. @kelemen, that is a very interesting detail. Thanks for pointing it out! :bow: I will consult to `loom-dev@` for details and update this if needed. For the record, I created #2725 to replace monitors with locks in Log4j 2. I will be working on it... > When is the planned release of log4j3? @zekronium, every maintainer has a different opinion about it, mine is: I don't see it happening this year. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
