ramanathan1504 commented on PR #4410: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/4410#issuecomment-6311058434
> > I will try to get Log4j 3.0.0 ready by Christmas: do we need this PR in that case? Is adding com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml in a Spring Boot 4 application a problem? > > Having both Jackson 2 and Jackson 3 is only a problem if they are not configured to work the same (they don't by default) and the app ends up using both for similar things. Ideally the app itself should ONLY use Jackson 3. Spring 4.x will only use Jackson 3. But third party libraries might still depend on Jackson 2. > > If 3.0 is actually released by Christmas then no, I would not bother with this. Spring Boot itself won't upgrade to Log4j 3.x in Spring Boot 4.x but we can certainly verify that it works. @rgoers I am ready to give my support to `3.0.0`. please check the #3161 'PR' attachment file. I think it will helpful for us to move forward -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
