nmatt opened a new issue, #4783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/4783

   ### Apache NetBeans version
   
   Apache NetBeans 15
   
   ### What happened
   
   Example Java source code:
   ```java
   public abstract class AbstractBase
   {
       abstract void method();
       
       static
       {
           AbstractBase base = new Derived();
           base.method();
       }
   }
   
   final class Derived extends AbstractBase
   {
       @Override
       void method() { return; }  // (*)
   }
   ```
   
   NetBeans shows a warning and hint '*Remove unused "method"*' on the 
overriding `method()` field (*), This is incorrect, because clearly the method 
is being used, via the `AbstractBase` type. The usage analysis apparently 
doesn't take overridden methods into account.
   
   NetBeans 12.2 (which I used previously) does not show that warning, although 
it does support the same hint ("Unused Element"). So this appears to be a 
regression.
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   See example source code above.
   
   ### Did this work correctly in an earlier version?
   
   Apache NetBeans 12.3 or earlier
   
   ### Operating System
   
   Windows 10 Enterprise 22H1
   
   ### JDK
   
   Oracle JDK 8u271
   
   ### Apache NetBeans packaging
   
   Apache NetBeans provided installer
   
   ### Anything else
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit a pull request?
   
   No
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   Yes


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Reply via email to