matthiasblaesing commented on PR #5866: URL: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/5866#issuecomment-1522258869
> @matthiasblaesing I was thinking that it may make sense to keep all of the new jakarta packages together. It makes sense to keep web.beans and web.beans.jakarta together for now, but thinking of the long term does it make sense to keep this new package named jakarta.web.beans in an effort to group jakarta-specific packages together? Understood. My reasoning would be that javamail and jakarta-mail or web.beans and jakarta.web.beans have more in common with each other, than jakarta mail and jakarta.web.beans. On the other hand, this is a side discussion and was just my first impression. If you follow my reasoning great, if not, also ok, I'd like to see jakarta support in NetBeans and that is the important point ;-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
